The retrieval of first mesospheric ozone results (Dr. C. v. Savigny) were done
with SCIARAYS (Dr. J. Kaiser) in the Hartley bands using wavelengths between
240 and 300 nm. The CMAM data correspond to an August mean, i.e. also NH
summer, this should be good enough for a rough comparion. At least we know the
order of magnitude is correct.
There seems to be a slight altitude and/or concentration difference, but (a) we
don't know yet what the expected errors of the retrieval are, and (b) CMAM
(like all middle atmosphere models) has not been properly validated with real
observations in this altitude range. CMAM is known to underestimate ozone
densities in the upper stratosphere, i.e. above 35 km. This is most likely due
to too much actice haligen species there. Since the upper stratosphere is too
transparent for UV photons the model overshoots at ozone density peak altitudes
(de Grandpre et al., JGR, 26,475-491, 2000). Units are molec/cm^3, of course.